I wrote this short essay in 2010 during what would become one of the college courses that influenced me most, Philosophy of the Common Good. I recently unearthed a paper copy of it on which I had scribbled: Do Not Throw Away. I'm not sure if I would still use the term laziness for our tendency toward the easiest path, but maybe it is that. This essay felt timely in the current political context, but more so I see many of these themes present as the manifesto I am trying to live by.
Democracy as Listening:
Coles examines voices that can contribute to democracy and concludes "we could take the perfect storm threatening democracy as an occasion- an instigation- to reinvent boats more worthy of journeys of democratic promise" (pg. 263). One way to do this is through the process of remaining in motion. Deconstruction speaks to this as it cultivates the democratic process of a willingness to become destabilized to peer behind and to hear. Democracy is an art of listening, of re-inventing and re-imagining as we share and mingle with one another. It requires learning to ask better questions of ourselves and of others.
For most, laziness is our default mode of operation; we exert the least amount of energy possible to accomplish any goal. This laziness has crept into out process of conversation and undermines democratic ways of being. We know very little of how to open ourselves and how to encounter, we rely on formulaic conversation that doesn't breach the surface. Despite our truest and noblest desires to know or be known, questioning and true exploration of others are hindered by what we think we must ask or not ask. These formulaic conversations don't allow for spontaneous or new encounter. We often do not learn or meet things in new ways because we are busy (and lazily) drawing conclusions, categorizing, and organizing people and experiences in our head ahead of hearing them. Our language, rituals, and social structures confine us to the same ways of relating-- even if that leaves us without genuine human interaction or democracy. These formulas also conceal how we really desire to interact or encounter an other, a "You." -- even our self.
Democracy is birthed from our ability to be
listeners. It is not created by a set of rules or exported in a style of government; it is first and foremost the willingness to respond. This is a task of extraordinary attentiveness and of humble self-sacrifice. True listening is an act of surrendering; it is possibly the greatest act of servanthood because it completely subverts our selfish inclinations and at the core validates the other as equal. When we chose to listen to another we open ourselves to the dislodging of our own ideas and values and create a space where ideas can be confronted, reworked, and re-imagined. This is the root of democracy as a theory of remaining in motion, it sets us journeying to find the common good because the new ideas must be processed and categorized. every encounter is dynamic and shaping; though without listening they can be simply mutually reienforcing and undemocratic. When we
hear the whole of an other (their values, anticipation, their
self) we are forced to recognize their humanity, equality, and right to exist in all the same ways as our self.
Yet, there are two categories we hear others in: friends and enemies. We easily allow some people to speak into our life while forcefully opposing the voice of others. This has to do with perceived difference, and the threat to our stability and way of seeing-- just as we duck from a branch swinging towards our face, we duck from the presence of others who would disturb our way of being. We believe what we want to beleive, and the way we think actually transforms how we see the world around us, the language we use controls our framework and worldview. How can we truly listen to those we repel because of their confrontation to our self? How do we develop ways of passing people from the category of enemy to friend, from tolerating to
listening? What creates in us the ability to be taught-- especially by those we least want to learn from?
Receptivity cannot be imposed from outside our selves but is cultivated within by living in the paradox of our own identity-- both as a host and a guest, as rooted and sojourner. We must enjoy the exhiliartion of discomfort, of risk, like diving into cold water, participating in an extreme sport, or giving a speech-- one comes to that moment of extreme fear and anticipation and then must plunge in. We must hold our own convictions within hopeful doubt, opening ourselves to keep asking questions, to keep pressing forward in deconstructing, to continue allowing new information in. On a personal and national level, it is this democratic listening and receptivity that protects us from the inclination toward domination. A listener must ask "what does the other feel? what does the other need? How is the other experiencing the system, is this what they desire?" As Coles notes, it is this pursuit of the other that calls us to attentiveness, it is the moral thing which creates our subjectivity-- our very humanity (pg 151).
What motivates us to becomes listeners is the belief that only through encountering do we progress- only through listening can democracy be formed. There is a need to cultivate our capacity for wonder-- not just at beauty or scenery, but wonder a the mysteries of another person, developing our desire for exploration. As Buber says, "try to meet every person, situation, and object in its own way." Democracy requires of us to continually crack open our habits and examine them. Just as those who travel are inflicted with the "virus" (the travel bug) of craving authentic cultures-- to see new places, to travel for the chance of experiencing profoundness-- once we encounter an other in a genuine way we gain a contagious desire to travel into the profoundness of another person. The way we move forward is to destabilize and question, to draw new lines and merge ideas, to continue in this cycle of unraveling and stitching up. Coles speaks to this in his encouragement to engage with the dangerous and strange within ourselves and others and to develop receptiveness to alterity. "Encounter is the only way to challenge the fantasy and reality between our ideals."
We will always wrestle with the subtle, yet, powerful forces inside us that wish to dominate and prone to laziness. The forces that desire to colonize the hearts of others with our own values instead of inhabiting another as guest, as a sought after presence and allowing their impression to weigh on the vacancies of our own. Democracy is an art of travel, of remaining in motion. It is the process of finding better questions to ask, more honest ways of seeking and revealing ourselves-- and of allowing others to emerge, not trying to order, control, or possess them but to reach out for genuine human interaction. This is the character of love, to appreciate and hear an other for whom they are, and to sacrificially desire what is best for them.* Democracy is only possible as we become listeners who encounter and respond.
The End
*I think my idea of love has evolved towards both/and "my liberation is bound up with yours" and that is requires seeking the good of the other as sacrifice of pure self-interest.